Best NodeJS Architecture for Scalable Cloud Apps: Monolith vs Microservices vs Serverless (Shorterloop’s Guide)
Originally published: https://shorterloop.com/the-product-mindset/posts/best-nodejs-architecture-for-scalable-cloud-apps-monolith-vs-microservices-vs-serverless-shorterloops-guide
Choosing the best architecture for your cloud app is crucial for achieving scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness.
In this guide, we will explore the pros and cons of three popular Node.js architectures — Monolith, Microservices, and Serverless — and provide insights on when to use each one.
Understanding Monolithic Architecture:
Monolith architecture involves having all the code in one block, making it easy to write and test initially. However, as the app grows, it becomes challenging to scale and make changes without affecting the entire app.
Advantages of Monolithic Architecture:
- Easy to start and fast to run.
- Low cost at the beginning.
Disadvantages Monolithic Architecture:
- Difficult to scale and grow.
- Changes can impact the entire app.
- Integration of new technologies can be challenging.
When To Use Monolithic Architecture:
- Building an MVP or small-scale app.
- Team size is small (1–5 developers).
- Need rapid development and deployment.
- Budget constraints require low upfront costs.
Example: A local business’s booking system or a simple CMS.
Understanding Microservices Architecture:
Microservices architecture involves breaking the app into small, independent parts that can function autonomously. This allows for scalability, flexibility in technology choices, and fault isolation.
Advantages of Microservice Architecture:
- Each part can grow independently.
- Ability to mix tools for each part.
- Fault tolerance — if one part fails, others remain operational.
Disadvantages of Microservice Architecture:
- Harder to monitor all parts.
- Costlier to manage many separate parts.
- Debugging can be time-consuming.
When To Use Microservices Architecture Over Monolithic:
- Scalability is critical (e.g., e-commerce, SaaS platforms).
- Different teams work on separate features (e.g., authentication, payments).
- Want flexibility to use different technologies.
Understanding Serverless Computing:
Serverless architecture involves running code only when needed, eliminating the need for constantly running servers. This model offers cost efficiency, automatic scaling, and reduced server management burdens.
Advantages of Serverless Architecture:
- Pay only for what you use.
- Autonomously manage code execution.
- Less server management required.
Disadvantages of Serverless Architecture:
- Initial run can be slow.
- Tied to a specific cloud provider.
- State management can be challenging.
When To Use Serverless Vs Microservices:
- Traffic is unpredictable.
- Want zero server management.
- Cost-per-use billing aligns with your budget.
Example: AWS Lambda for image processing, Slack bots.
Why Shorterloop Prefers Microservices Over Serverless:
- Always-On Uptime: Ensures 99.99% SLA for enterprise clients.
- Stateful Connections: Requires persistent servers for Websocket-based 2FA.
- Predictable Costs: Microservices with reserved instances save 40% compared to serverless at their scale.
In conclusion, selecting the appropriate architecture — Monolith, Microservices, or Serverless — depends on the project’s scale, team expertise, and long-term goals. Each architecture has its advantages and limitations, so it’s essential to assess your specific requirements before making a decision.
At Shorterloop, the Microservices architecture best aligns with their needs, providing scalability, flexibility, and cost optimization for their Node.js applications.
FAQs About Microservices vs Monolith vs Serverless in Node.js
1. What is monolithic architecture in Node.js development?
A monolithic design means all your code sits in one block. It’s quick to build but hard to change later.
Key Points:
- One large, unified codebase
- Fast to launch at first
- Scaling gets tricky
Key Takeaway:
Monoliths = duct tape. Fast, messy, but effective for small jobs.
2. What is microservices architecture in Node.js?
Microservices split your app into small, independent services. Each piece runs on its own. This helps with scalable authentication and easier updates.
Key Points:
- Code divided into small parts
- Each service works alone
- Makes updates and scaling simpler
Key Takeaway:
Microservices = LEGO bricks. Flexible, scalable, but takes effort to assemble.
3. What is serverless architecture in cloud computing?
Serverless means your code runs only when needed. In Node.js, AWS Lambda is often used. It bills per call and can save money.
Key Points:
- Code runs on demand
- Uses AWS Lambda frequently
- Cost-efficient but may have cold starts
Key Takeaway:
Serverless = vending machine. You pay only when you grab a snack.
4. How do monolith, microservices, and serverless compare?
A monolith is a single block. Microservices break work into units. Serverless executes functions only when required. Each has its pros and cons.
Key Points:
- Monolith: simple but rigid
- Microservices: flexible yet complex
- Serverless: cost-friendly, with possible delays
Key Takeaway:
No perfect choice — pick what fits your team and project.
5. How do I choose the right design for my Node.js app?
It depends on your team size and needs. Small projects may start as a monolith. Bigger teams might choose microservices or serverless for better scaling.
Key Points:
- Check your team size and growth
- Think about update needs
- Balance cost with performance
Key Takeaway: Start simple. If you outgrow it, shift gears.
6. What are the scalability benefits of these designs?
A monolith scales as one unit. Microservices let you scale parts separately. Serverless scales each function call automatically.
Key Points:
- Monolith: scales as a whole
- Microservices: scale individual parts
- Serverless: auto-scales per use
Key Takeaway:
Need control? Go microservices. Need automation? Serverless wins.
7. What challenges do microservices and serverless face?
Microservices can be hard to manage and debug. Serverless may face cold start delays and state issues. Both need careful planning.
Key Points:
- Microservices: more pieces to track
- Serverless: occasional startup delays
- Both require good monitoring
Key Takeaway:
More flexibility = more complexity. Know what you’re signing up for.
8. How do I secure my Node.js app in these systems?
Security is vital. In a monolith, secure the whole block. With microservices, each service needs its own keys and tokens. Serverless functions must be locked down too.
Key Points:
- Use proper keys and tokens
- Lock down each service
- Keep authentication strong
Key Takeaway:
Security isn’t automatic. Protect every piece of your system.
9. Can I migrate from a monolithic system to microservices or serverless?
Yes, you can switch with careful planning. Many teams move to microservices for better scaling or choose serverless to cut costs.
Key Points:
- Plan each step carefully
- Start with small changes
- Transition gradually
Key Takeaway:
Migration = remodeling. Don’t knock down walls without a plan.
10. How do cost factors compare in these Node.js apps?
Cost matters. Monoliths start cheap but may grow costly. Microservices need extra tools. Serverless bills per use, which can save money if managed well.
Key Points:
- Monolith: low cost at start, higher later
- Microservices: extra management costs
- Serverless: economical pay-per-use model
Key Takeaway:
Pay upfront (monolith) or pay per use (serverless). Pick what fits your budget.
🚀 Have questions or need expert guidance? Drop a comment below or reach out to Shorterloop Engineering for personalized assistance. Explore more insights and best practices by visiting our Engineering Blog.
Check what we use in the Frontend.
#NodeJS #CloudArchitecture #Microservices #Serverless #Scalability
